Bryan formerly managed the Open Organization section of Opensource.com, which features stories about the ways open values and principles are changing how we think about organizational culture and design. He's worked on Opensource.com since 2011. Find him online as semioticrobotic.
Authored Comments
Thanks. That helps. And I suspect it tempers a bit the notion that free software "mandates sharing," because this is a specific case in which no such mandate is in place. That might be an interesting fulcrum on which one might lean when making the case for free software and/in the enterprise.
"Central to the spirit of free software is the idea that everyone should be able to use, modify, and share, with a defined limitation that you can't modify without sharing."
Is this true? My understanding is that I'm free to modify free software for personal use as much as I'd like without any compulsion to share those modifications. But should I choose to share the modified version of the software I must, in turn, share the modified source. Yes?