Over the last months, I became more and more aware of the "open" movement. "Open" as in open access, open source, open data, open science. I n mid 2011, I had a project where…
It is just that I do not think that open science spreads with the new mMass version - it has been open source before I got involved, and it is only a tiny contribution to science, so that to say that the additions would spread open science is a little bit exaggerated... ;-)
To make the transparency complete: The first title the open source team put together is still kind of visible in the post's url: "open-source-yes-science-others-block-progress".
I did not like this one as I did not really felt blocked by the scientist who did not want to share his code - in fact, he did block himself more than he blocked me. :-)
Authored Comments
It is just that I do not think that open science spreads with the new mMass version - it has been open source before I got involved, and it is only a tiny contribution to science, so that to say that the additions would spread open science is a little bit exaggerated... ;-)
To make the transparency complete: The first title the open source team put together is still kind of visible in the post's url: "open-source-yes-science-others-block-progress".
I did not like this one as I did not really felt blocked by the scientist who did not want to share his code - in fact, he did block himself more than he blocked me. :-)
I have changed the post title - the one Red Had has written was too pathetic... ;-)